By Ahmad Shuaibu Isa
The recent visa denial to Nigeria’s Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), General Christopher Musa, and his delegation by Canada has sparked heightened diplomatic tensions, further complicating Nigeria’s international relations. This incident, where senior military officers were blocked from attending an event in Canada honoring war veterans, has brought to light concerns about Nigeria’s image abroad and its foreign relations. The strong condemnation from Nigeria’s National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu, emphasizes the frustration felt within Nigeria’s leadership regarding how the situation was handled.
At the same time, allegations have surfaced concerning the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and its indirect funding of terrorist organizations, including the created Boko Haram, to the tune of $697 million annually. This revelation, made by U.S. Congressman Scott Perry, has alarmed security experts and diplomats in Nigeria. These claims highlight serious concerns over the misallocation of aid and the possibility of USAID’s resources inadvertently supporting violent extremist groups in conflict zones.
Why would any organization intentionally create and support terrorist groups like Boko Haram? Given Nigeria’s vast resources in the conflict zones, why not engage in negotiations with Nigeria to form business partnerships, access resources, and create mutual benefits? Why resort to violence and destruction, causing the deaths of innocent Nigerians instead of fostering cooperation and economic growth? What drives such organizations to destabilize a nation rich in potential, instead of promoting peaceful solutions and development?
In addition to these concerns, the Nigerian military and government’s track record of human rights violations has led to severe domestic and international consequences. Notably, incidents such as the 2015 Zaria Massacre, where hundreds of Muslims of the Islamic movement in Nigeria were killed by the Nigerian Army, and the ongoing persecution of Shia Muslims, have contributed to Nigeria’s declining international reputation. These violations not only fuel internal unrest and extremism but also diminish Nigeria’s credibility and deter foreign investment and cooperation.
Ribadu’s sharp criticism of Canada for its visa denial emphasizes the broader implications of the incident, which is seen as an affront to Nigeria’s sovereignty. The refusal to grant visas to top military officials for an official event sends a negative message about Nigeria’s national security standing and its global relations. Such incidents harm military morale and compromise Nigeria’s ability to seek international support for security matters, potentially isolating the nation further on the world stage.
Domestically, this controversy has stirred frustration among some Nigerian elites. Ribadu’s call for Nigerians to “fix our country” resonates with a desire to tackle the deep-rooted security challenges and strengthen Nigeria’s global standing. His remarks underscore the need for a unified national security strategy and more effective diplomatic engagement to overcome these issues. However, this also highlights systemic security flaws that need urgent attention to bolster Nigeria’s international presence.
The public nature of this dispute with Canada further underscores the failure of diplomatic communication between the two nations. Effective diplomacy should involve behind-the-scenes negotiations, especially when addressing sensitive matters like visa denials. Had Nigeria approached this issue more discreetly, a resolution may have been reached without the public fallout, demonstrating the importance of tact in diplomatic affairs.
Looking ahead, Nigeria must adopt a more strategic diplomatic approach. Engaging in discreet, behind-the-scenes discussions with countries like Canada is essential for resolving disputes without escalating tensions. Furthermore, the allegations of USAID funding terrorist groups serve as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding foreign aid in conflict zones. As a nation, Nigeria should prioritize the well-being of its citizens, focusing on initiatives that benefit both the people and society at large. Additionally, it is essential to ensure that international aid is closely monitored to prevent any unintended negative consequences.
This incident also presents an opportunity for Nigeria to rebuild and enhance its international reputation. By focusing on the security of the Nigerian people, addressing corruption, and increasing transparency within its military and government, Nigeria can regain respect on the global stage. A cohesive national security strategy, built on the interests of the Nigerian people, will improve Nigeria’s credibility and foster stronger international cooperation.
Internally, Ribadu’s statement highlights the need for greater national unity and a more robust security framework. The government must take concrete steps to address the underlying causes of insecurity, improve the effectiveness of security agencies, invest in infrastructure, and promote economic growth that will strengthen security of the people.
Reforming the security sector and collaborating with international partners that demonstrate good intentions will be crucial for ensuring long-term peace and stability.
While Ribadu’s frustrations are understandable, Nigeria must avoid retaliatory actions that could harm good diplomatic relations. Constructive dialogue and diplomacy, even amidst disagreements, are essential for protecting Nigeria’s peace and resourceful interests.This situation offers an opportunity to reassess Nigeria’s foreign policy and refine its approach to resolving future diplomatic disputes.
In conclusion, the visa denial incident, along with the USAID funding allegations, highlights ongoing frustrations within Nigeria’s national security apparatus and its diplomatic challenges with foreign powers. While Ribadu’s remarks reflect a strong sense of national pride and exasperation, Nigeria must adopt a more diplomatic and strategic approach to addressing these issues. By strengthening internal security systems and nurturing constructive external diplomatic relationships, Nigeria can turn these challenges into opportunities for growth, improved international relations, and enhanced security for all its citizens.
Ahmad Shuaibu Isa